![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
UBC #20
(Bet y'all thought I was never going to make it to number 20, huh?)
Karlsen, Carol F. The Devil in the Shape of a Woman: Witchcraft in Colonial New England. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1987.
I had a couple of UBC failures before I read this book, both foundering on the same problem: namely, if I don't enjoy reading about some critical fraction of the protagonists of a novel, I won't read the novel. Because it becomes an exercise in self-punishment, and I don't need that.
I will try both of them again at some later point and see if maybe it was a mood/stress problem.
But in the interim, I turned to nonfiction.
The Devil in the Shape of a Woman is both fascinating and frustrating. Its subject matter (witchcraft accusations in New England between about 1630 and 1692, which is the date of the Salem "outbreak") is compelling in that sort of oh god I can't look trainwreck fashion; I found it frustrating because Karlsen's theoretical models for how witchcraft accusations work socially and the cultural work they do are almost naively simplistic. And she has the problem I've noticed over and over again in books about non-"rational" beliefs in previous eras, where she gives lip service to the idea that the people involved, both witches and their accusers, believed in witches and Satan and were entirely sincere in their testimony, but her analysis assumes, over and over again, that we can treat these cases as if their subjects were consciously aware that they were lying. This tendency is especially notable in her chapter on possessed people, where her analysis makes it hard to imagine the young women involved didn't know exactly what they were doing. And that makes it even more difficult than it already is to understand the human beings involved in these terrible events.
(Bet y'all thought I was never going to make it to number 20, huh?)
Karlsen, Carol F. The Devil in the Shape of a Woman: Witchcraft in Colonial New England. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1987.
I had a couple of UBC failures before I read this book, both foundering on the same problem: namely, if I don't enjoy reading about some critical fraction of the protagonists of a novel, I won't read the novel. Because it becomes an exercise in self-punishment, and I don't need that.
I will try both of them again at some later point and see if maybe it was a mood/stress problem.
But in the interim, I turned to nonfiction.
The Devil in the Shape of a Woman is both fascinating and frustrating. Its subject matter (witchcraft accusations in New England between about 1630 and 1692, which is the date of the Salem "outbreak") is compelling in that sort of oh god I can't look trainwreck fashion; I found it frustrating because Karlsen's theoretical models for how witchcraft accusations work socially and the cultural work they do are almost naively simplistic. And she has the problem I've noticed over and over again in books about non-"rational" beliefs in previous eras, where she gives lip service to the idea that the people involved, both witches and their accusers, believed in witches and Satan and were entirely sincere in their testimony, but her analysis assumes, over and over again, that we can treat these cases as if their subjects were consciously aware that they were lying. This tendency is especially notable in her chapter on possessed people, where her analysis makes it hard to imagine the young women involved didn't know exactly what they were doing. And that makes it even more difficult than it already is to understand the human beings involved in these terrible events.
