Date: 2005-09-26 04:27 pm (UTC)
No, of course not. I'm not talking about obligation, and there's nothing wrong with writing solidly within the genre tradition if that's what you want to do. I figure, as sf/f/h writers, we're obligated to tell the best stories we can to the best of our ability, and defining "stories" and "ability" has to be done on a case by case basis.

What Ursula said just happens to resonate extremely strongly for me, because:

1. when wearing my literary scholar hat, I'm a genre theorist more than anything else

2. The books I've been working on are secondary-world fantasy generically in the same camp as Tolkien and all his fanboyz.

3. I personally want to push the boundaries of the fantasy genre, to find out what it can do if I just lean on it a little harder.

There are lots of different ways to lean on it, mind you. One of them is character development. Another is treating a secondary world's history seriously, instead of just throwing in a Cataclysm to be sure nobody asks any awkward questions. And a third is trying to think outside the D&D box and trying to redefine "fantastical." None of these ways is necessarily more valuable than any other.

And, you know, nobody's keeping score.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

truepenny: artist's rendering of Sidneyia inexpectans (Default)
Sarah/Katherine

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 09:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios