Date: 2006-11-15 09:16 pm (UTC)
*nod* I saw. I think I disagree, but again, it's been a long time since I saw the movie.

I read it as a very deconstrictive film--far more deconstructive than you did, I think. Deconstructive of its own anarchy, in fact, while still at a loss to present a better solution. I think the issues it addresses are reasonably valid, and it certainly got me thinking hard, and I didn't feel as if it offered a specific worldview but rather chose to problematise some common ones. Also, I read it as mythological/fairy tale, in the sense that everybody in the movie is somehow a reflection of the central character. And in a lot of ways it's about him feeling emmasculated.

(He's also, you know, quite quite clinically crazy, which is certainly made plain.)

So I guess I'm not seeing construction of gender roles as much of an issue, as it's a movie that's specifically about male experiences of certain kinds of gender roles. (Much as I don't see the lack of significant male characters in, oh, "Boys on the Side" as much of a problem, as it's a movie about a certain kind of female experience of gender.)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

truepenny: artist's rendering of Sidneyia inexpectans (Default)
Sarah/Katherine

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 10:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios