Let's talk about sex.
Dec. 19th, 2006 08:05 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
truepennyETA: since ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
metafandom has apparently linked to this post sans context, let me state explicitly that I'm talking about the MISLABELING of original fiction featuring a same-sex relationship--as for example, ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
matociquala's Carnival--as slash in reviews and commentary by people who are not slash writers themselves. I'm not trying to talk about what slash writers choose to do within their fandoms and communities. Not a slasher. Don't play one on TV. I'm arguing that slash, as a term, belongs to fanfiction, and should not be applied to works that are not fanfiction. My reasons for feeling as I do, explained in the following post, stem partly from my own career as a pro writer whose work features a lot of same-sex relationships, and partly from my appreciation, as a genre theorist, of the intertextual subversion inherent in what slash does.
The subtext, as Giles says to Buffy in "Ted," is rapidly becoming text.
hth
More specifically, let's talk about slash and why it is offensive and heteronormatizing to equate it with homosexual relationships.
The subversion/containment model (proposed by Foucault and applied by a bunch of New Historicist critics in the 1980s) has buried somewhere in the unexamined assumptions of its premise the notion that somehow subversion is bad. Or nonsustainable. Conservation of energy. A society tends to conserve the status quo.
This may be descriptively true (she says, looking dourly at her own society), but prescriptively, it sucks major moose cock, because it assumes that subversion exists to be contained. Hence Natalie Zemon Davis's elaboration of Foucault with her "pressure-valve" idea. (Which, btw, I think is incredibly helpful for understanding extremely conservative societies--like I said, descriptively the idea can be very helpful.)
Slash is subversion.
(For those of you who are still wondering what on earth I'm talking about, slash is a kind of fanfiction which posits a romantic/sexual relationship between two characters who in canon have no such thing. You might also describe it as an underground movement. It's named for the labelling convention that marks it; the first slash was K/S: Kirk-slash-Spock.)
Slash says, "These two canonically romantically-uninvolved characters have a close, intense, and obviously loving relationship. Our society--as inscribed on these characters by censorship and other kinds of normatizing pressure--does not allow that relationship to be developed in a sexual way. Let's transgress the taboo."
Now, obviously, that transgression can be done mindfully or otherwise, but the key component to slash is the overt sexualization of a non-sexual, or only subtextually sexual, relationship.
That relationship is, 9 times out of 10, between two men. Because, 9 times out of 10, the most intense and interesting relationship in any given canon is--wait for it--between two men. (And that has to do with a whole bunch of other factors and influences including, you know, four or five millennia worth of patriarchy.)
Now, why am I so adamant that slash is not the same as homosexual relationships?
Because I insist that homosexual relationships ought not to be categorized as subversive.
(Okay, yes, leftist liberal commie bitch, that would be me. Please don't tell me you're surprised.)
Labelling a homosexual relationship in a work of fiction as slash is wrong for a couple of reasons. One is that it's eliding the line between a work of fiction and commentary ON that work of fiction. I think it's inherent to slash that it is subverting and deconstructing and undercutting a canon text's assumptions about sexuality and love (using "text" here in a broad and metaphorical sense, rather than the literal one of words-printed-on-a-page). Slash is a game played with canon, and part of its value is in the tension it both creates and illuminates between canon text and subtext.
The other reason that it's wrong to label homosexual relationships, whether in or out of fiction, as slash is that it is reinscribing heteronormativity on our society and our discourse. It's a syllogism. Slash is gay sex. Slash is subversive. Therefore, gay sex is subversive. The subversion/containment model is a BOX, and as long as we keep putting homosexual relationships in that box, we are reinforcing the idea that heterosexuality is the standard by which all other sexualities will and ought to be judged. The same idea that is powering the (often hysterical) attempts to define marriage in such a way that gay and lesbian people cannot have it. Because their committed monogamous relationships are being judged as subversive.
And that's so horribly wrong that it's eaten all my words.
metafandom has apparently linked to this post sans context, let me state explicitly that I'm talking about the MISLABELING of original fiction featuring a same-sex relationship--as for example, matociquala's Carnival--as slash in reviews and commentary by people who are not slash writers themselves. I'm not trying to talk about what slash writers choose to do within their fandoms and communities. Not a slasher. Don't play one on TV. I'm arguing that slash, as a term, belongs to fanfiction, and should not be applied to works that are not fanfiction. My reasons for feeling as I do, explained in the following post, stem partly from my own career as a pro writer whose work features a lot of same-sex relationships, and partly from my appreciation, as a genre theorist, of the intertextual subversion inherent in what slash does.The subtext, as Giles says to Buffy in "Ted," is rapidly becoming text.
hth
More specifically, let's talk about slash and why it is offensive and heteronormatizing to equate it with homosexual relationships.
The subversion/containment model (proposed by Foucault and applied by a bunch of New Historicist critics in the 1980s) has buried somewhere in the unexamined assumptions of its premise the notion that somehow subversion is bad. Or nonsustainable. Conservation of energy. A society tends to conserve the status quo.
This may be descriptively true (she says, looking dourly at her own society), but prescriptively, it sucks major moose cock, because it assumes that subversion exists to be contained. Hence Natalie Zemon Davis's elaboration of Foucault with her "pressure-valve" idea. (Which, btw, I think is incredibly helpful for understanding extremely conservative societies--like I said, descriptively the idea can be very helpful.)
Slash is subversion.
(For those of you who are still wondering what on earth I'm talking about, slash is a kind of fanfiction which posits a romantic/sexual relationship between two characters who in canon have no such thing. You might also describe it as an underground movement. It's named for the labelling convention that marks it; the first slash was K/S: Kirk-slash-Spock.)
Slash says, "These two canonically romantically-uninvolved characters have a close, intense, and obviously loving relationship. Our society--as inscribed on these characters by censorship and other kinds of normatizing pressure--does not allow that relationship to be developed in a sexual way. Let's transgress the taboo."
Now, obviously, that transgression can be done mindfully or otherwise, but the key component to slash is the overt sexualization of a non-sexual, or only subtextually sexual, relationship.
That relationship is, 9 times out of 10, between two men. Because, 9 times out of 10, the most intense and interesting relationship in any given canon is--wait for it--between two men. (And that has to do with a whole bunch of other factors and influences including, you know, four or five millennia worth of patriarchy.)
Now, why am I so adamant that slash is not the same as homosexual relationships?
Because I insist that homosexual relationships ought not to be categorized as subversive.
(Okay, yes, leftist liberal commie bitch, that would be me. Please don't tell me you're surprised.)
Labelling a homosexual relationship in a work of fiction as slash is wrong for a couple of reasons. One is that it's eliding the line between a work of fiction and commentary ON that work of fiction. I think it's inherent to slash that it is subverting and deconstructing and undercutting a canon text's assumptions about sexuality and love (using "text" here in a broad and metaphorical sense, rather than the literal one of words-printed-on-a-page). Slash is a game played with canon, and part of its value is in the tension it both creates and illuminates between canon text and subtext.
The other reason that it's wrong to label homosexual relationships, whether in or out of fiction, as slash is that it is reinscribing heteronormativity on our society and our discourse. It's a syllogism. Slash is gay sex. Slash is subversive. Therefore, gay sex is subversive. The subversion/containment model is a BOX, and as long as we keep putting homosexual relationships in that box, we are reinforcing the idea that heterosexuality is the standard by which all other sexualities will and ought to be judged. The same idea that is powering the (often hysterical) attempts to define marriage in such a way that gay and lesbian people cannot have it. Because their committed monogamous relationships are being judged as subversive.
And that's so horribly wrong that it's eaten all my words.
Experimental Job
Date: 2016-11-17 06:20 pm (UTC)http://shemale.replyme.pw/?page.zoie
shemail sex move ts dating transexual chat free shemail movie shemalle
Callow Project
Date: 2016-11-18 07:02 am (UTC)http://futanari.porndairy.in/?aliya
adult videos sexy girl erotic body paint erotic calendar sex photo
Unencumbered galleries
Date: 2016-11-19 05:00 am (UTC)girdles open bottom porno paintes sexy thong women
http://sissythings.pornpost.in/?profile.kenzie
online clothes shopping in south africa little girl petticoats meet women and men women raped women 2011 harley davidson fatboy old men daddies sexy stock photography articles on women
My unfamiliar website
Date: 2016-11-19 06:18 am (UTC)http://gay.adultgalls.com/?pg-stanley
gay dating website gay pride shirts gay ecards gay profile gay partners
Mature galleries
Date: 2016-11-19 01:09 pm (UTC)http://futanari.replyme.pw/?blog.alice
free shmale sex shemeal videos freeshemale.cum shemal free movies chicks with dicks
Renewed install
Date: 2016-11-20 12:21 pm (UTC)http://hotpic.erolove.in/?post-nora
good vidio sex com adult three wheel bikes handi xxx videos super bouncing ball big milf
My new website
Date: 2016-11-20 03:44 pm (UTC)http://shemaledating.sexblog.pw/?private.ariana
transexuals sex video sex videos sexuality videos free young transexual pics sex videos shemals
Delivered matured galleries
Date: 2016-11-21 11:15 am (UTC)buy contemporary art how to make feminized cannabis seeds what is family therapy
http://sissyblog.twiclub.in/?view.delaney
night gowns cheap sex enhancement pills how to grow from seed cannabis herbal shops in johannesburg sluts heaven people search south africa la weight loss steel categories
Adult galleries
Date: 2016-11-21 06:32 pm (UTC)http://gayarab.erolove.in/?pg.roberto
ian somerhalder gay gay dating free gay ice tube gay marriages gay wallpaper
Adult galleries
Date: 2016-11-22 12:31 am (UTC)http://blackgay.net.erolove.in/?pg.sonny
man gay gay tony jonathan bennett gay elton john gay gay parents
Latest plat
Date: 2016-11-22 03:42 am (UTC)http://tits.porndairy.in/?brief.maia
eve angel anal fucking movies political map of africa hot movie clips from hollywood sing me an old fashioned song mp3
Open matured galleries
Date: 2016-11-22 12:48 pm (UTC)http://futanari.blogporn.in/?profile.amaya
shemall pictures young transexual pics shemail sex vids shemle tranys.com
My unfamiliar website
Date: 2016-11-22 02:57 pm (UTC)http://shemales.xblog.in/?profile-fatima
shemal free movies freeshemale movie shemaleporn shemale freeshemalemovies.com
My unfamiliar website
Date: 2016-11-22 07:05 pm (UTC)http://asianmilf.xblog.in/?special_alexus
2400 cal diet and pregnant big tit fucking videos old no update cd code now fear mp vidberry hentai
Social pictures
Date: 2016-11-22 11:31 pm (UTC)http://cars.photos.twiclub.in/?entry-melinda
paula abdul porn azureus amatuer porn file share man sucks his own cock porn porn long movie free samples tila tequila gallery porn
Unencumbered galleries
Date: 2016-11-23 02:26 am (UTC)http://gayarab.erolove.in/?page-blaise
gay rights history free gay games find gay men gayed tube james dean gay
Recent install
Date: 2016-11-23 03:57 pm (UTC)http://shemales.xblog.in/?post-joselyn
shmale transxual sex free shemail movie free shemal sex shemen
New spot
Date: 2016-11-24 05:22 am (UTC)http://twerking.porndairy.in/?deja
erotic lingerie erotic traveler classic erotic art balkan erotic epic most erotic scene
Unencumbered galleries
Date: 2016-11-24 07:56 am (UTC)http://hiddencam.xblog.in/?alaina
auto erotic asphixiation erotic books telugu erotic stories erotic photoshoots erotic japanese
Pictures from social networks
Date: 2016-11-24 12:37 pm (UTC)http://teen.porndairy.in/?kaliyah
free adult videos what is erotic adult cartoons free erotic hypnosis erotic stuff
New plat
Date: 2016-11-24 06:36 pm (UTC)http://arab.egypt.adultnet.in/?entry.lyndsey
islamic 1945 airtran ireland 0nline
Adult galleries
Date: 2016-11-25 04:02 am (UTC)http://shemale.replyme.pw/?profile-alivia
p or n sex transxual sex free pron vidos.com shemal young transexual pics
Experimental Poke out
Date: 2016-11-25 04:47 am (UTC)http://asslick.photo.erolove.in/?entry.stephany
liz vega playboy indin hindi sex of chut fine ribbed rubber matting courtney simpson max hardcore trailer brothers sisters fuck
Mature galleries
Date: 2016-11-25 03:25 pm (UTC)http://toys.adultnet.in/?pictures.armani
erotic readings free adult sites erotic novel online adult sex
Unencumbered galleries
Date: 2016-11-25 09:28 pm (UTC)http://asian.replyme.pw/?stella
sex party erotic circus victorian erotic art sex films erotic snow white