ext_8885 ([identity profile] truepenny.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] truepenny 2006-12-19 06:46 pm (UTC)

I'm not arguing against same-sex being part of the definition of slash. Because, 9 times out of 10, it is

I think the "subversive" part of the definition is more important than the "same-sex" part. So whereas many people are expanding "slash" to include canonical same-sex, I'm trying to expand it to include non-canonical het.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting