I'm not arguing against same-sex being part of the definition of slash. Because, 9 times out of 10, it is
I think the "subversive" part of the definition is more important than the "same-sex" part. So whereas many people are expanding "slash" to include canonical same-sex, I'm trying to expand it to include non-canonical het.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
momijizukamori
no subject
Date: 2006-12-19 06:46 pm (UTC)I think the "subversive" part of the definition is more important than the "same-sex" part. So whereas many people are expanding "slash" to include canonical same-sex, I'm trying to expand it to include non-canonical het.