ext_4233 ([identity profile] matociquala.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] truepenny 2006-12-21 05:06 pm (UTC)

*g* It's part of a conversation that's been going on for a while. Probably a little confusing taken out of context.

Here's some backstory, from my blog....

(there's also been talk over at [livejournal.com profile] commodorified, which I think I linked all of in my posts....

http://matociquala.livejournal.com/975984.html

http://matociquala.livejournal.com/983069.html

http://matociquala.livejournal.com/983735.html

http://matociquala.livejournal.com/984007.html

http://matociquala.livejournal.com/984921.html

*g* Somebody sent a bunch of fans into a bunch of pros talking about, you know, *our* concerns. Which of course overlap with fannish concerns, but don't map directly.

Basically, we object to non-slash-fans calling our work, featuring original gay characters, "slash." For the reasons I enumerated, and the ones [livejournal.com profile] truepenny did. We don't object to slash fans enjoying our work, and we don't even in particular object to slash fans calling what we do "slashy," though it might feel a little odd.

Is that helpful?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting