Date: 2006-12-21 06:22 pm (UTC)
I think the 'subversion' aspect of slash is an accident of sociology, not a raison d'etre

Jesus Christ, yes. That's where this post rubs me the wrong way. I don't go out there saying "ooh, I'm gonna be edgy and write myself some slash."

Sure, one can use the definition that slash=non-canon, but in that case Modesty/Willie is slash and the whole slash/het/gen breakdown (which is actually understandable 95% of the time) is pointless and wrong. I'm not wild about this idea.

The way I see it, I write fanfic. Sometimes that fanfic involved non-canon pairings. Sometimes it involves same-sex pairings. The fact that I use the term "slash" for the second category rather than the first doesn't in any way mean I want to "fictionalize" real same-sex relationships, any way than my use of the word "het" means I want to fictionalize real opposite-sex relationships. And I'm really, really not keen on the idea of trying to determine people's views on sexual politics by their use of one frickin' word.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

truepenny: artist's rendering of Sidneyia inexpectans (Default)
Sarah/Katherine

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 04:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios