ext_8885 ([identity profile] truepenny.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] truepenny 2007-07-14 04:37 pm (UTC)

Okay, that's fair.

(I meant to say that I thought one of the reasons there's a pretty heavy overlap between mystery readers and sff readers is exactly the commonality of the puzzle-solving, but it dropped out the bottom of my head.)

There ought to be a way to articulate the difference between litfic puzzle solving and specfic puzzle solving . . . although I realize as I type this that actually, one of the reasons I enjoyed Foe so much is that I could read it as specfic. Which is the same phenomenon [livejournal.com profile] pameladean describes in Tam Lin when Janet discovers that Paradise Lost is science fiction. So the question is, why doesn't it work in reverse?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting