thinking about Firefly
Jan. 3rd, 2003 07:43 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
truepennyMy subconscious gets another cookie. Last night I dreamed about Mal.
I've been thinking about Firefly lately (because I'm spoiler-free on Buffy, and staying that way AND thinking about Buffy is going to cause my head to explode a la the Gentlemen). One of the other reasons the poor damn show should be continued is the level of realism it manages. Yes, I know, SF, no realism in sight, except that there are ways and ways of writing SF for television, and some of them are even less realistic than their premise.
Firefly remembers that space is a vacuum. I love it for this forever. It answers questions like, where are the toilets and how do they work? (We're still waiting on the showers, but I know the answer's out there.) And it examines, over and over again, the truths about the chain of command.
I'm not a big Star Trek fan, but I've watched ... well, actually, I think I've watched more than my fair share of various franchises. TNG, DS9 (which I actually came to love), and, may the powers have mercy, Voyager. I have never watched an episode of Enterprise, nor will I unless forced. What always happens when I see commercials for it is I think, Sam! What happened? And then I have to go away and cry.
The point I'm getting at can best be explored via Voyager. There was a while there where MH and I were watching Voyager, although we couldn't even explain to ourselves why, and what happened after every episode is that we would systematically take it to pieces, often times rewriting to follow a more vigorous standard of logic. And one of the single worst things on Voyager was the cavalier and consistent dismissal of the chain of command. B'Lana (did I spell that even remotely right?) and Parris are Starfleet officers in the same chain of command. They should not sleep together. I don't mind that they do, since Voyager is all by herself out there in the deep, but I want it to be a PROBLEM. I want the show to TALK about it. And it never does, in the same way that Janeway's nauseating rhetoric of family is allowed to resolve conflicts that are not ABOUT family. They're about the chain of command.
(We had a game we played with that, which began, "No one can sleep with anyone. Except Seven of Nine. Seven of Nine doesn't want to sleep with anyone." And it got more demented from there. Usually it ended with Tuvak stuffing Neelix out an airlock and the whole crew celebrating.)
Now Serenity isn't a commissioned vessel. But Mutant Enemy knows the chain of command is there nevertheless and knows that because of it, the characters are going to hit some serious interpersonal snags. We see this most clearly and most consistently with Wash ("War Stories" is all about this problem, as Wash fails to separate chain-of-command from friendship/romance), but Jayne runs afoul of it in "Ariel," and we see Mal forced to be unsympathetic to Kaylee in "Out of Gas," because, no matter how much he loves her, she's his engineer and he doesn't have time for her to have a crisis. Mal has to behave in some ugly ways sometimes, because he's the captain. Firefly faces up to that and goes ahead and LETS him be an asshole if it's what he has to do to keep Serenity flying. And he doesn't forfeit our sympathy for it. I like Mal better BECAUSE he won't back down and because if he has to, he'll let his crew hate him, just so long as he can keep them, himself, and his ship alive.
In general, Star Trek franchises do not have this kind of courage (DS9 is the honorable exception, but it's also a freakish fluke in the family of ST shows), and there are stories they can't tell because they aren't willing to follow their own premises to their logical conclusions. And I'm sure if Firefly had backed down from some of its own premises and conclusions, it wouldn't have been cancelled, because it would look like Star Trek and the rest of mainstream television-SF. But then it wouldn't be Firefly, and I wouldn't be able to write this insanely long post about how intelligent it is.
Keep flying, Serenity.
I've been thinking about Firefly lately (because I'm spoiler-free on Buffy, and staying that way AND thinking about Buffy is going to cause my head to explode a la the Gentlemen). One of the other reasons the poor damn show should be continued is the level of realism it manages. Yes, I know, SF, no realism in sight, except that there are ways and ways of writing SF for television, and some of them are even less realistic than their premise.
Firefly remembers that space is a vacuum. I love it for this forever. It answers questions like, where are the toilets and how do they work? (We're still waiting on the showers, but I know the answer's out there.) And it examines, over and over again, the truths about the chain of command.
I'm not a big Star Trek fan, but I've watched ... well, actually, I think I've watched more than my fair share of various franchises. TNG, DS9 (which I actually came to love), and, may the powers have mercy, Voyager. I have never watched an episode of Enterprise, nor will I unless forced. What always happens when I see commercials for it is I think, Sam! What happened? And then I have to go away and cry.
The point I'm getting at can best be explored via Voyager. There was a while there where MH and I were watching Voyager, although we couldn't even explain to ourselves why, and what happened after every episode is that we would systematically take it to pieces, often times rewriting to follow a more vigorous standard of logic. And one of the single worst things on Voyager was the cavalier and consistent dismissal of the chain of command. B'Lana (did I spell that even remotely right?) and Parris are Starfleet officers in the same chain of command. They should not sleep together. I don't mind that they do, since Voyager is all by herself out there in the deep, but I want it to be a PROBLEM. I want the show to TALK about it. And it never does, in the same way that Janeway's nauseating rhetoric of family is allowed to resolve conflicts that are not ABOUT family. They're about the chain of command.
(We had a game we played with that, which began, "No one can sleep with anyone. Except Seven of Nine. Seven of Nine doesn't want to sleep with anyone." And it got more demented from there. Usually it ended with Tuvak stuffing Neelix out an airlock and the whole crew celebrating.)
Now Serenity isn't a commissioned vessel. But Mutant Enemy knows the chain of command is there nevertheless and knows that because of it, the characters are going to hit some serious interpersonal snags. We see this most clearly and most consistently with Wash ("War Stories" is all about this problem, as Wash fails to separate chain-of-command from friendship/romance), but Jayne runs afoul of it in "Ariel," and we see Mal forced to be unsympathetic to Kaylee in "Out of Gas," because, no matter how much he loves her, she's his engineer and he doesn't have time for her to have a crisis. Mal has to behave in some ugly ways sometimes, because he's the captain. Firefly faces up to that and goes ahead and LETS him be an asshole if it's what he has to do to keep Serenity flying. And he doesn't forfeit our sympathy for it. I like Mal better BECAUSE he won't back down and because if he has to, he'll let his crew hate him, just so long as he can keep them, himself, and his ship alive.
In general, Star Trek franchises do not have this kind of courage (DS9 is the honorable exception, but it's also a freakish fluke in the family of ST shows), and there are stories they can't tell because they aren't willing to follow their own premises to their logical conclusions. And I'm sure if Firefly had backed down from some of its own premises and conclusions, it wouldn't have been cancelled, because it would look like Star Trek and the rest of mainstream television-SF. But then it wouldn't be Firefly, and I wouldn't be able to write this insanely long post about how intelligent it is.
Keep flying, Serenity.
