ext_5509 ([identity profile] herewiss13.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] truepenny 2016-12-04 06:03 pm (UTC)

It has been some time since I've read the book so I may have a detail wrong, but , ironically, I believe the consensus now is that the Burgess fauna are (mostly) now connected to established taxa, rather than early "lost experiments."  Hallucigenia, for example, is related to velvet worms.  All the arguments about historical contigency still hold much weight, though.


*sigh* If only Gould were still around for a new edition (among other endeavors) :-(


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting