matociquala asked
Jun. 21st, 2003 10:18 amThe first mention of W. Shakespeare, actor and playwright, comes from the vindictively jealous pen of Robert Greene, in his Groatsworth of Wit (1592, the year of his death; in fact GWoW appeared posthumously):
I found the relevant passage, tidily excerpted, here, and Amazon claims they can get Groats-worth of Witte for you; I'll let y'all judge whether you want to believe that, and whether it's worth $59 to you for a reprint of a 1923 edition.
The whole text (with, be warned, abominable formatting) is up on this staunchly pro-Marlowe page
Or, you can find it in .pdf or .html, with much better formatting, from here, a middle school in British Columbia.
For the Oxfordian view, take a look at this.
Here's a review of the 1994 edition, suggesting that Groatsworth of Wit was largely or entirely written by its publisher, Henry Chettle.
There is an upstart Crow, beautiful in our feathers, that, with his tiger's heart wrapt in a player's hide, supposes he is as well able to bombast out a blank verse as the best of you, and, being an absolute Johannes Factotum, is, in his own conceit, the only Shakescene in the country.
I found the relevant passage, tidily excerpted, here, and Amazon claims they can get Groats-worth of Witte for you; I'll let y'all judge whether you want to believe that, and whether it's worth $59 to you for a reprint of a 1923 edition.
The whole text (with, be warned, abominable formatting) is up on this staunchly pro-Marlowe page
Or, you can find it in .pdf or .html, with much better formatting, from here, a middle school in British Columbia.
For the Oxfordian view, take a look at this.
Here's a review of the 1994 edition, suggesting that Groatsworth of Wit was largely or entirely written by its publisher, Henry Chettle.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-21 08:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-21 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-21 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-21 08:41 pm (UTC)Anne Lamott quotes the first line in Bird by Bird and I have desired madly ever since to read the whole thing.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-22 12:27 am (UTC)http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jpd/remaindered.html
*giggles madly all over again on rereading it*
"Edsels of the world of moveable type", indeed.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-22 05:42 am (UTC)I've seen them in remainder bookstores myself.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-22 10:49 am (UTC)I am grinning like a fool now.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-21 09:23 am (UTC)Well, not quite true. Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay does get taught and is one of the four non-Shakespearean Eng. Ren. plays on the Master's exam reading list for my department (the M.A. here is broadly generalist; you start with Beowulf and end with Toni Morrison). But, okay, yes, outside of a small tribe of geeks, Greene's claim to fame is slamming Shakespeare.
[/nitpick]
Somehow I do not think this would make him any less bitter. *g*
no subject
Date: 2003-06-21 09:05 am (UTC)Bitter Green
Date: 2003-06-21 10:22 am (UTC)Thank you, truepenny!
Oh, it's on Peter Farey's page! He froths rather well, and I have to credit him for his primary sources: it's a great resource, which I've stolen ^H^H^H^H^H^H borrowed from extensively.
These darn Marlovians. If they don't get me, the Oxfordians will.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-21 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-21 08:42 pm (UTC)And reminds me that I stalled out halfway through The Knowledge of Water--they were so grim and miserable and going to hell in such an UGLY handbasket--and need to get back to it.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-21 11:07 pm (UTC)