Latin minutiae question
Jul. 2nd, 2003 11:02 pmI ask on behalf of
heres_luck and
renenet, because I don't want to tell them the wrong thing.
They were talking, apparently--and you'll have to ask one of them for the context--about the word "subterranean" and wondering what the opposing term for above-ground would be. I think--and said--that it would be "superterranean," but my Latin's a little rusty and I'm not quite sure what the distinction is between super- and supra-.
Can you distinguish between ABOVE ground (as in the "airs above ground" of the Lippizaners) and ON the ground?
And, off my own bat, what would the word be for "through the earth," i.e., neither above nor below? Or is that even a distinction that the Latin conception of terra allows for?
Disquisitions welcome! The more pedantic the better!
They were talking, apparently--and you'll have to ask one of them for the context--about the word "subterranean" and wondering what the opposing term for above-ground would be. I think--and said--that it would be "superterranean," but my Latin's a little rusty and I'm not quite sure what the distinction is between super- and supra-.
Can you distinguish between ABOVE ground (as in the "airs above ground" of the Lippizaners) and ON the ground?
And, off my own bat, what would the word be for "through the earth," i.e., neither above nor below? Or is that even a distinction that the Latin conception of terra allows for?
Disquisitions welcome! The more pedantic the better!
no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 12:51 am (UTC)I think super- and supra- are close to synonymous, although my outdated shorter OED tells me the prefix supra-'s "meanings in English are for the most part parallel to, but in much less vogue than those of SUPER-, except in certain scientific uses" and my Latin dictionary says that compounds formed with supra- are very rare.
If you were willing to accept words of Greek derivation and limited utility, you could have hyperchthonic (above the earth), hypernephelic (above the clouds), and hyperuranian (above the heavens). I think only the last is an actual English word, but it's not my fault.
Intraterrestrial, for within or through the earth?
Or is that even a distinction that the Latin conception of terra allows for?
Terra is earth, (as opposed to water, fire, air) while mundus is the world (as opposed to the flesh and the devil) (and tellus is the earth (as opposed to the other planets) (also poetic for terra) and humus is the ground, the soil), so yeah, compounds formed from terra should work just fine. I would think.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 03:06 am (UTC)So, the OED satisfies my curiosity quite thoroughly. "Superterranean" is in there: That is or dwells above, or on the surface of, the earth; above-ground: opposed to subterranean. Also n., a dweller above ground or on the earth. Quotations refer to superterranean inhabitants, structures, chambers, etc. However, "supraterraneous" and "supraterrestrial" are also there, with pointers to the definitions of "superterraneous," and "superterrestrial," respectively. "Superterraneous" simply refers back to the def. for "superterranean." "Superterrestrial" has two meanings: 1. Existing, or belonging to a region, above the earth; celestial and 2. superterranean.
The comments on the "super-" and "supra-" prefixes and their uses go on for quite a little while. It's really quite edifying. But it boils down to what
So, I'd say that while "superterranean" is probably our preferred term, "supraterranean" should also be considered an established construction given the presence of "supraterraneous" in the OED.
But everyone needs to keep talking about the Latin to answer all of Truepenny's questions.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 05:32 am (UTC)I like intraterrestrial, or perhaps, to be perverse, intraterranean. I don't have a thing in the world to do with that word, but I like it all the same.
I also adore hyperchthonic and hypernephelic. Those are just beautiful.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 05:35 am (UTC)I don't mind particularly, 'cause, hey! words!, but I do feel a little bit like an idiot asking a question on your behalf which you then answer.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 08:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 08:18 am (UTC)Don't feel like an idiot. I'm quite sure we wouldn't consider your brain a research tool if you were an idiot.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 09:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 10:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 10:09 am (UTC)This is your brain on reasearch.
Answer your own questions.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 10:29 am (UTC)Not at all. I didn't remember it myself until a couple of days ago when I was entering the conversation about penguin consumption into the quote book. *g*
no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 10:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 10:57 am (UTC)Love the icon. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 11:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-03 03:13 pm (UTC)