common proof techniques
Jul. 22nd, 2003 01:36 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
truepennyMentioned by ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
claerwen in the comments to this post of stakebait's (and Arguing: The Collectible Card Game sounds like the best idea ever, Mer!), which I found via the lovely and ever-helpful renenet.
These are math proofs, but many of them work brilliantly when translated into liberal arts. Especially Proof by Reference to Inaccessible Material, Proof by Ghost Reference, and Proof by Semantic Shift. But I adore them all.
claerwen in the comments to this post of stakebait's (and Arguing: The Collectible Card Game sounds like the best idea ever, Mer!), which I found via the lovely and ever-helpful renenet.These are math proofs, but many of them work brilliantly when translated into liberal arts. Especially Proof by Reference to Inaccessible Material, Proof by Ghost Reference, and Proof by Semantic Shift. But I adore them all.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-07-22 11:45 am (UTC)Mer