Dude. No worries. I'll read it this week, we'll talk about it, and then you can wash its face and clean under its fingernails, or whatever the appropriate extension of your metaphor is, and it'll be all good.
I think you need renenet to be Lloyd Dobleresque at you here for a minute.
You must see the movie. As h.l points out, everything seems to be well in hand, but for what it's worth I do encourage you to relax — by force, if necessary. Lloyd Dobler indeed said it best when he was accosted by Jeremy Piven (http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0005315/)'s very drunk character, Mark, at the end of a post-graduation blow-out of a party. Brace yourself for shouting and click here (http://www.oberlin.net/~renenet/mustchill.wav), please.
Linked to you as a friend of friends; happens I edit dissertations for a living.
My therefore experienced advice is: Have at it! Since you're getting into that final polishing mode, here are the most common errors I come across in editing this level of stuff, to keep an eye on:
Use EndNotes if you can possibly get it, to keep your citations/refs in order - this will save you from date typos in citations, or from citing sources you forgot to list in the references, or from listing references you forgot to cite.
Format a style guide for your title headers, to make sure they're consistent across the entire manuscript. If that H1 header at the Abstract is all caps, center, bold, then it needs to be that way for the Chapter titles and the References and Appendices' titles, too. In the past year and a half of doing technical reviews as one of the vetted editors of a small grad school in SF, and the past 22 years of doing editing and pre-press production, this is surprisingly the most common source of errors in this type of manuscript.
Use APA or MLA formatting if they'll let you - the Chicago Manual has all the details, but - bless their pointed little heads, they have all the details for preparing any kind of manuscript that might ever appear at the doors of the Chicago Press shudder and it's still basically the same pile of notes it started as 97 years ago. twitch
And while it takes its final, formal form, step back and breathe from time to time. Yes it's this big, tedious thing you've spent X number of years on (what's your topic?) and it will be Done Soon.
Doing the flavor of technical review I do, the piece that surprised me is how emotionally engaging the process is, sort of a technical midwifery.
I'm familiar with the perils of formatting from trying to get my novel chapters to be consistent (for my own satisfaction more than anything else), but it's good to have a heads-up to know what I ought to be double-checking.
Happily, MLA is preferred in my department, which makes everything so much easier.
My topic is ghosts in Renaissance revenge tragedy. Somewhere back here ... *rummages* here (http://www.livejournal.com/users/truepenny/104900.html) I have a smallish rundown, which is accurate except that Bussy D'Ambois has been replaced by The Second Maiden's Tragedy, which is a great relief to all concerned.
Good luck with polishing the dissertation. You know you can do it! You've almost made it, just the final furlong, last lap, one more push (or whatever metaphor you favour). Keep taking the deep calming breaths.
I only had to do orals on an MA, not a PhD, but I went into it regarding the process and somewhere between an initiation and hazing. "I went through this, so you have to, and mine was tough, so yours will be tougher" seems to sum up the attitude.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 06:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 03:39 pm (UTC)I think you need
no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 03:42 pm (UTC)(Tho' the Say Anything allusion would be even more cheering if I'd ever actually seen the movie.)
I'm giving myself this evening to spaz and goof off and whinge, and tomorrow it's back to the gerbil wheel.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 07:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 03:55 pm (UTC)'When a man is about to be hanged it concentrates the mind wonderfully'
no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 06:14 pm (UTC)From here until I deposit, I'm gonna need all the luck I can get.
As the baseball players say, I'd rather be lucky than good.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 10:49 am (UTC)Dissing the dis
Date: 2003-09-06 04:52 pm (UTC)Bah. Lady, you write fiction.
This is just a little old thesis paper. It don't even have to break my heart.
*hug*
support from a new reader
Date: 2003-09-06 05:23 pm (UTC)My therefore experienced advice is: Have at it! Since you're getting into that final polishing mode,
here are the most common errors I come across in editing this level of stuff, to keep an eye on:
Use EndNotes if you can possibly get it, to keep your citations/refs in order - this will save you from date typos in citations, or from citing sources you forgot to list in the references, or from listing references you forgot to cite.
Format a style guide for your title headers, to make sure they're consistent across the entire manuscript. If that H1 header at the Abstract is all caps, center, bold, then it needs to be that way for the Chapter titles and the References and Appendices' titles, too. In the past year and a half of doing technical reviews as one of the vetted editors of a small grad school in SF, and the past 22 years of doing editing and pre-press production, this is surprisingly the most common source of errors in this type of manuscript.
Use APA or MLA formatting if they'll let you - the Chicago Manual has all the details, but - bless their pointed little heads, they have all the details for preparing any kind of manuscript that might ever appear at the doors of the Chicago Press shudder and it's still basically the same pile of notes it started as 97 years ago. twitch
And while it takes its final, formal form, step back and breathe from time to time.
Yes it's this big, tedious thing you've spent X number of years on (what's your topic?) and it will be Done Soon.
Doing the flavor of technical review I do, the piece that surprised me is how emotionally engaging the process is, sort of a technical midwifery.
Breathe.
PUSH!
Re: support from a new reader
Date: 2003-09-06 05:58 pm (UTC)I'm familiar with the perils of formatting from trying to get my novel chapters to be consistent (for my own satisfaction more than anything else), but it's good to have a heads-up to know what I ought to be double-checking.
Happily, MLA is preferred in my department, which makes everything so much easier.
My topic is ghosts in Renaissance revenge tragedy. Somewhere back here ... *rummages* here (http://www.livejournal.com/users/truepenny/104900.html) I have a smallish rundown, which is accurate except that Bussy D'Ambois has been replaced by The Second Maiden's Tragedy, which is a great relief to all concerned.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 08:41 pm (UTC)All the very best of luck to you on the last little leg of this race.
Pamela
Slightly belated good wishes
Date: 2003-09-07 09:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 09:49 am (UTC)You can do it - you're a professional!
Best of luck!
no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-10 03:58 am (UTC)