![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
truepennyRight. The dissertation has a structure.
The introduction is still a wallowing chaotic mess--although it does now have most, if not quite all, of its bits in, since![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
heres_luck kindly pointed out to me that great wodges of it had somehow migrated into the Titus Andronicus section. I have been through the first five chapters, trying to bring the language into line so that the fact--also pointed out by HL--that I do have a coherent thematic, if not quite an argument, will be visible to the naked eye.
This feels like progress.
I. Introduction
II. Pamphlets of haunting, 1643-1683
III. Seneca
IV. The Spanish Tragedy
V. Richard III and Titus Andronicus
VI. Hamlet
VII. The Atheist's Tragedy, The Second Maiden's Tragedy, The Changeling, The Revengers Tragedy
VIII. Conclusion (still mostly unwritten)
The introduction is still a wallowing chaotic mess--although it does now have most, if not quite all, of its bits in, since
heres_luck kindly pointed out to me that great wodges of it had somehow migrated into the Titus Andronicus section. I have been through the first five chapters, trying to bring the language into line so that the fact--also pointed out by HL--that I do have a coherent thematic, if not quite an argument, will be visible to the naked eye.This feels like progress.
