Right. The dissertation has a structure.
The introduction is still a wallowing chaotic mess--although it does now have most, if not quite all, of its bits in, since
heres_luck kindly pointed out to me that great wodges of it had somehow migrated into the Titus Andronicus section. I have been through the first five chapters, trying to bring the language into line so that the fact--also pointed out by HL--that I do have a coherent thematic, if not quite an argument, will be visible to the naked eye.
This feels like progress.
I. Introduction
II. Pamphlets of haunting, 1643-1683
III. Seneca
IV. The Spanish Tragedy
V. Richard III and Titus Andronicus
VI. Hamlet
VII. The Atheist's Tragedy, The Second Maiden's Tragedy, The Changeling, The Revengers Tragedy
VIII. Conclusion (still mostly unwritten)
The introduction is still a wallowing chaotic mess--although it does now have most, if not quite all, of its bits in, since
This feels like progress.
Intriguing.
Date: 2003-09-21 06:51 pm (UTC)Re: Intriguing.
Date: 2003-09-21 07:00 pm (UTC)Re: Intriguing.
Date: 2003-09-21 07:08 pm (UTC)Re: Intriguing.
Date: 2003-09-22 01:40 am (UTC)Hmmm... There might be the seed of a short story in that...
Re: Intriguing.
Date: 2003-09-22 05:58 am (UTC)Re: Intriguing.
Date: 2003-09-22 07:02 am (UTC)Re: Intriguing.
Date: 2003-09-22 07:31 am (UTC)Re: Intriguing.
Date: 2003-09-22 10:15 am (UTC)Pamela
no subject
Date: 2003-09-21 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-21 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-22 12:14 am (UTC)The introduction is still a wallowing chaotic mess
Yours and mine both. I think it's the nature of Introductions. Wallowy, messy, and designed to torment. ~glares at Introduction draft~
no subject
Date: 2003-09-22 07:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-22 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-22 06:16 am (UTC)And once you have an intro, some of that will be the seeds of the conclusion chapter, right?