more reviews
Aug. 11th, 2005 12:08 pmThe August Locus includes Faren Miller's review of Mélusine. It's not online, sadly, but it is a lovely review. Not so much because she likes the book--although I'd be lying if I said that didn't make me as happy as a happy puppy--but because she seems to understand what I was trying to do, which gives me hope that I actually succeeded in doing it.
the_red_shoes and
hominysnark also have nice things to say (I don't know if it's appropriate to say thank you--it feels kind of like it isn't, since they're not saying nice things as a favor to me--but I am very very happy about people liking the book), and there's now a third positive review on Amazon, too. [ETA: that 3rd Amazon review is by
gwyneira, who also has it posted in her LJ here.]
On the other hand, lest you think my ego is swelling to unmanageable proportions, Carolyn Frank's review* for SFRevu is utterly underwhelmed.
---
*If the direct link doesn't work for you, as it refuses to do for me, go to SFRevu's August issue, and scroll down to the book reviews.**
---
**And if that doesn't work, as it is now not working for me ... hell, I don't know what you do. Go on your merry way, I suppose.
On the other hand, lest you think my ego is swelling to unmanageable proportions, Carolyn Frank's review* for SFRevu is utterly underwhelmed.
---
*If the direct link doesn't work for you, as it refuses to do for me, go to SFRevu's August issue, and scroll down to the book reviews.**
---
**And if that doesn't work, as it is now not working for me ... hell, I don't know what you do. Go on your merry way, I suppose.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 05:50 pm (UTC)"Replete with degrading sex," huh? I ... just. Well. Yes.
I quite like the new Amazon review.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 05:59 pm (UTC)Degrading sex.
Not that that has any bearing on the PLOT or anything. What about the non-degrading sex? Huh? Huh?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 06:54 pm (UTC)Maybe I should make myself a REPLETE WITH DEGRADING SEX icon. Even if I don't use it or anything.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 08:14 pm (UTC)"It's a moral imperative!" --Chris Knight (Val Kilmer), Real Genius
no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 07:13 pm (UTC)My copy of the book is shipping now, at any rate, and so I'll see what I think relatively soon.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 07:21 pm (UTC)I'm not sure I actually managed to convey how much I loved the book, but I was engrossed in it as soon as I picked it up - I walked around with my nose in it all day, much to the detriment of the various household tasks I was trying to complete.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-12 08:30 pm (UTC)That review will be seen by thousands of librarians, who will hopefully decide to buy one or three or seven copies for their libraries.
Congratulations!
no subject
Date: 2005-08-12 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 06:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-29 03:49 pm (UTC)