![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
1. White middle-class American child of privilege. Yes, that's me.
2. Three and four generations back, there's hefty chunks of Irish and Scottish in my ethnic heritage. This, however, is so far back as to be nearly meaningless, and is completely irrelevant to my own experience of race. So the fact that some of my ancestors were oppressed minorities? Gets me no bonus points. I'm still a white middle-class American child of privilege.
3. Americans--especially though not exclusively white liberal Americans--are so fucked up about race that we don't even know how to start having a conversation, even with the best intentions on all sides. Does this mean we shouldn't try to have the conversation? Hell, no. It means the opposite: we should try, and KEEP TRYING, and learn. One painful lesson at a time.
4. Because the alternative is for us to keep ignoring it la la la can't hear you la la la. And that is stupid and wrong-headed. And leaves the oppression right where it is.
5. Even writing this post makes me acutely uncomfortable because I know I'm probably saying it wrong.
6. The obverse side of cultural appropriation is that if nobody except people of a particular minority (class, race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, etc.) write about that minority, then representations of that minority will never get out of the ghetto of being "minority writing." Which reinscribes the problem very neatly on itself.
7. "Race" itself is a slippery and problematic term. And in America it is very much bound up with class--another slippery and problematic term.
8. Yes, I am focusing on race in America. Because that's what's under my nose and what I've been engaged with, willy nilly, since I was born. I do not believe that what I'm saying about American attitudes and perceptions and fallibilities applies anywhere else.
9. I don't have any answers.
10. I know good intentions aren't enough.
11. But they're better than bad intentions. Or disingenuity.
12. And as a fiction writer, I have to believe that imaginative empathy is achievable. And that it is worthwhile.
13. And I have to believe that human beings can learn.
14. I'm also fully aware that pronouncing my opinions is another exercise of my white middle-class privilege. Because what right do I have to talk about any of it? But see #6: I think the discussion needs to be had, and I think the people with privilege had damn well better show willing.
2. Three and four generations back, there's hefty chunks of Irish and Scottish in my ethnic heritage. This, however, is so far back as to be nearly meaningless, and is completely irrelevant to my own experience of race. So the fact that some of my ancestors were oppressed minorities? Gets me no bonus points. I'm still a white middle-class American child of privilege.
3. Americans--especially though not exclusively white liberal Americans--are so fucked up about race that we don't even know how to start having a conversation, even with the best intentions on all sides. Does this mean we shouldn't try to have the conversation? Hell, no. It means the opposite: we should try, and KEEP TRYING, and learn. One painful lesson at a time.
4. Because the alternative is for us to keep ignoring it la la la can't hear you la la la. And that is stupid and wrong-headed. And leaves the oppression right where it is.
5. Even writing this post makes me acutely uncomfortable because I know I'm probably saying it wrong.
6. The obverse side of cultural appropriation is that if nobody except people of a particular minority (class, race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, etc.) write about that minority, then representations of that minority will never get out of the ghetto of being "minority writing." Which reinscribes the problem very neatly on itself.
7. "Race" itself is a slippery and problematic term. And in America it is very much bound up with class--another slippery and problematic term.
8. Yes, I am focusing on race in America. Because that's what's under my nose and what I've been engaged with, willy nilly, since I was born. I do not believe that what I'm saying about American attitudes and perceptions and fallibilities applies anywhere else.
9. I don't have any answers.
10. I know good intentions aren't enough.
11. But they're better than bad intentions. Or disingenuity.
12. And as a fiction writer, I have to believe that imaginative empathy is achievable. And that it is worthwhile.
13. And I have to believe that human beings can learn.
14. I'm also fully aware that pronouncing my opinions is another exercise of my white middle-class privilege. Because what right do I have to talk about any of it? But see #6: I think the discussion needs to be had, and I think the people with privilege had damn well better show willing.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-03 10:31 pm (UTC)One of my areas of teaching is "multicultural literature" (which, translated, means literature by minority cultures in the United States). It's a slippery dangerous term because it tends to reinforce the idea that only "minorities" have a cultures (and not "whites" -- which is of course a racial term, not an ethnic term). But it's something I'm heavily committed to because, adding another note to your list:
#14. If the only people who teach and learn literatures from different cultures (ethnic minority cultures epecially) are people from those cultures, then the problems of past segregation are repeated in current separatism.
I have to be careful here myself because "academics" are often perceived (perhaps rightly, perhaps not) as showing up on the internet and lecturing people. It's an occupational hazard, but when I saw your post, I wanted to share some of my own experiences.
People can learn, and one of the most important ways we learn about other cultures and each other is through the stories we all tell -- and the amazing and wonderful similarities and differences. And just about every ethnic group in this country is ignorant of many other cultures (but there are also a huge amount of interactions that are lost in the eurocentric history that is taught -- one of my favourite books to bring in to class is titled Black Indians -- forget the author but if you're interested, I can dig it out when I get to work Monday). Talk is important, but I also hope that reading can be part of this process.
I teach in Texas, in a rural area, which adds whole interesting levels because I am a native northwesterner ('yankee' to some of my students), and I must avoid the myth that only Southern whites are racist (Northern racism takes different forms and has a different history, but it exists).
I often use popular literature (mysteries, sf, film, television) and not just the literary canons--Octavia Butler's Kindred is one that has been popular with all my students. So have BarbaraNeely's mysteries.
Something I emphasize to all my students is that the concept of different human races is itself a product of 18-19th century racist science. Genetically, biologically, we are one species. The belief that blacks and whites are a different race is itself a racist one. We talk about race all the time as if it's a physical reality when it's not.
That doesn't mean race does not exist as a social construct (like gender, class, etc., and I agree--the intersections and connections are important and complicated). It just means we have to keep in mind the limits of that concept, and how the meanings shifted at different times/places.
And I am fascinated by authors who create characters from different cultures than their own -- it's a risky thing, but so important. I gather from this post and perhaps others that you're doing this sort of thing in your own writing? (My summer classes didn't make so my book buying budget is nonexistent this summer, but I'm always interested in making lists for future buying.)
One author I've watched with great interest (besides Charles de Lint) is Barbara Hambly, who has one series about a black character in pre-Civil War New Orleans (a freed slave who is always at risk, if caught in the wrong place even with his "papers", of being returned to slavery). He was educated in Europe and is trained as a doctor but of course cannot work as one -- so earns his living as a musician.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-04 03:48 pm (UTC)