Q&A 19

May. 4th, 2009 10:08 am
truepenny: artist's rendering of Sidneyia inexpectans (Default)
[personal profile] truepenny
Q: My question is, what is the etymological relationship between "Virtu" (as in Melusine's big important magical work) and "Virtuer" (as in Corambis' big important magic workers). Is it an old term that dates back to their shared origin, did one borrow from the other, or did both borrow from a third party? Basically, what is the cultural history that resulted in the semi-cognate?

A: Clearly, the reason you can make a Midlander/Marathine pun on virtus/virtue/vis AND that the Corambin word vi means magic and virtuer means magic-user, is that there's a Cymellunar root word back there somewhere from which all of these words derive.




Q: Now that both brothers can read, do you think that either of them will ever write? And if so, what would they write?

A: If Felix wanted to write, he would already have done so. He'll probably end up writing a lot of letters, though, to keep in contact with the virtuers in Esmer, and will almost certainly start publishing articles in Corambin academic journals.

I doubt Mildmay will start writing. He's a story teller. (Writing a story and telling a story are actually quite different actions.)

Q: Felix seems to have some interest in botany. Will he ever get the chance to keep a garden or something like that? I'm thinking it would be difficult near a lighthouse, since those are usually built in sandy or rocky areas. Would he have to settle for tormenting Mildmay with houseplants everywhere?

A: I love the houseplant idea. I don't know, though, whether Felix actually wants to grow plants.



Q: Is there ever a chance that Felix and Kay will end up having relations of a sort? Everytime they met I could almost feel the tension...or was I just imagining it?

A: As I've said in earlier Q&As, a relationship between Felix and Kay was originally part of the plot--so it's certainly possible. I don't know if it will happen, though. It would take a lot of negotiating.




Q: Could you elaborate on the scandalous Melusinian novels that Felix can't bring himself to read? I know you wrote about them in such a way that the reader could make a guess, but the idea just amused me so much that I had to ask.

A: They're clearly the paranormal romance/"urban fantasy"* version of Mélusine.

Q: What was family life like for Shannon, Stephen and Victoria as children? Were their relationships as we see them in the books shaped more by upbringing/personality or by later events such as Stephen becoming Lord Protector or Shannon coming out (assuming he did, and that he didn't just leave people to find out)? Urgh. I realise I'm not putting this very well.


Stephen and Victoria's mother died when they were not very old--and died in such a way that they probably never got a decent explanation, and probably weren't even allowed to talk about her. When their father remarried, he chose a beautiful, vain, and rather silly woman vastly his junior who would have made no effort to ingratiate herself with her step-children, since she was plotting to usurp the Protectorate for her own child. She gets burned at the stake, and their father forces through the legal adoption of Shannon--the spitting image of his mother, remember--into the Teverii, and shortly thereafter dies. He never got over Gloria Aestia. The fact that the three Teverii of this generation speak to each other at all is a testament to the determination on all sides not to take out their parents' mistakes on each other.

And, yes, Shannon was very in-your-face about his sexual orientation when he decided he liked boys.


---
*I put "urban fantasy" in quotes because--as we discovered on a panel about it at OddCon--whatever that genre is, "urban fantasy" is a misnomer. Urban fantasy is fantasy about cities--which the panel also discovered is a flourishing sub-genre including authors like China Miéville, Ellen Kushner, Fritz Leiber, and Terry Pratchett--but "urban fantasy," while very distinctly a genre, really needs a different name. (Oddly enough, both genres are clearly influenced--if not outright founded--by Charles de Lint and Emma Bull). I write urban fantasy; I do not write "urban fantasy" and couldn't if I tried.**

**This is not a slam against "urban fantasy." It is very much Not My Thing, but dude. Neither is hard SF. The fact that, obviously, I want to reappropriate the term "urban fantasy" for something else isn't because I think the books being called "urban fantasy" somehow don't "deserve" the label, but because, as a genre theory geek, I am frustrated by the fact that the term is being used to label a genre it doesn't describe, while a genre that it does describe, and which I think is really cool, doesn't have a label at all--or much recognition as a genre. From the genre-theory-geek perspective "urban fantasy" is actually really interesting, because what makes it a genre is the melange of genres it offers--fantasy, romance, mystery, action-adventure, maybe a little horror--but while the urban environment, or at least the postmodern cosmopolitan sensibility, is necessary to the genre, it's not really what books in this genre are about. Carole Nelson Douglas' Midnight Louie books are another example that fit into both genres: they're "urban fantasy," with the romance element and the mystery element and the fantasy element, but they are also distinctly about Las Vegas, and therefore are also urban fantasy. I realize this is all high-geek nitpicking, but, well, hi. Welcome to my brain.

And, okay, I have now used up my entire quota of quotation marks for probably the next week.



Q: Did you do any research on various forms of mood disorders and mental illness for this work? Because except for the hallucinations and more or less complete functional incapacity he suffered, his period of insanity reminded me a lot of my more unpleasant (and thankfully not nearly as common as they used to be) depressive phases, If you did do research, you absorbed it well; if you didn't, well, good job with what my signif other calls "imaginative sympathy", cause you got it right.

A: Thank you! I didn't do any formal research, no, so I guess if I had to offer an explanation, it would be that I spent a lot of time very carefully thinking through the consequences of what I'd set up.



Q: One of the things that really drew me in to the Doctrine of Labyrinths series was the way in which you had incorporated elements of Classical (Greek, Roman, Minoan) cultures. I am curious - how extensive is your background in Classics?

A: I majored in Classics as an undergrad at Case Western. (Okay, full disclosure: I double-majored in Classics and Literature, which was a cross-disciplinary program between English and Comparative Literature, and minored in Women's Studies.) So I took three years of Latin, two years of Greek, a variety of associated courses, and wrote a departmental honors thesis on Ovid's exile poetry. And before I went to grad school in English, I did the 6 week summer session of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, which was a crazy-intense crash course in both archaeology and Greek prehistory.

And, of course, the years when I was doing all this were the years when I was writing Mélusine, so it's not surprising that it all ended up in there.



[Ask your question(s) here.]

Date: 2009-05-04 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] truepenny.livejournal.com
See, I think Bull and de Lint both legitimately belong in urban fantasy without the quotation marks. The War for the Oaks is ABOUT Minneapolis, and de Lint's books are ABOUT his !Ottawa. Your third definition is actually what I mean by "urban fantasy" with the quote marks.

Date: 2009-05-04 04:47 pm (UTC)
davidlevine: (Default)
From: [personal profile] davidlevine
Oh. Sorry I missed that.

Date: 2009-05-04 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] truepenny.livejournal.com
I don't think I was being very articulate.

Date: 2009-05-04 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] d-aulnoy.livejournal.com
See, in my head, this is completely and entirely covered by the phrase "paranormal romance" - the key element isn't the fact that it's in a contemporary urban setting, it's that somebody is going to be getting it on with something nifty and spooky - not the first word in the description in either case, but the second.

The two types of urban fantasy, on the other hand, I find fascinating: I'd be loathe to take that label away from de Lint, Bull, etc., just because that definition came first, generically speaking, and could/would not be easily redefined. But you're quite right that the other kind, the writing imaginary cities from scratch, China Mieville, K.J. Bishop, *you* kind of urban fantasy needs a separate nomenclature. Hmmmmmm ....

Date: 2009-05-04 08:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] starlady38.livejournal.com
See, I don't think they should be cordoned off from each other, or even really that they are two separate things: they're both fantasy about place, about a particular urban space, and since it's fantasy, I don't think whether the place has an analogue in the "real" world is particularly consequential.

Profile

truepenny: artist's rendering of Sidneyia inexpectans (Default)
Sarah/Katherine

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 01:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios