truepenny: artist's rendering of Sidneyia inexpectans (ws: hamlet)
[personal profile] truepenny
Bergen, Doris. Twisted Cross: The German Christian Movement in the Third Reich. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1996.



So, I have a new theory, which is that the Treaty of Versailles caused a psychotic break in almost the entirety of the "Aryan" population of Germany. Given how egregiously they were being gaslighted by the leaders of the German armed forces, it's not entirely surprisiing. The Nazis didn't cause the psychosis; they were a manifestation of the psychosis--as were the German Christians, the subject of this book. But this psychotic moral reversal, having been encouraged for at least half a century beforehand (Bergen describes one example, the Protestant League, founded in 1887, as "foster[ing] a climate of hatred within German Protestant circles that both encouraged and legitimized collective resentments" (114)), was endemic to "Aryan" German culture in the twenties and thirties. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's Hitler's Willing Executioners, although problematic, I think makes, and hammers home, the point that the dominant culture of Germany was ready to hear what Hitler had to say, because all the pieces of Hitler's ideology were already available to them.

(Hitler was stunningly unoriginal; he basically just assembled all the unconnected pieces of hatred, entitlement, and bigotry lying around in "Aryan" German culture in the twenties into something that could be focused, aimed, and deployed for maximum destruction.)

In this context "German Christian" ("Deutsche Christen") means a specific movement in the Protestant German church, as opposed to, say, "Christian Germans," meaning everyone of Christian faith living in Germany--or Christians outside Germany who claimed or were claimed to be "ethnically German." (Bergen is one of the few writers on Nazi Germany and the Holocaust that I've read who recognizes how dangerous and slippery using the Nazi terminology of race is:
Labels are always tricky, but students of Nazi Germany face particular challenges. To describe National Socialism, we depend on the same words and phrases that Nazi propaganda appropriated and infused with particular meanings: words like race, blood, Aryan, German, and Jew.
(4)

It is vanishingly rare to find a historian who acknowledges this problem, and I appreciate it in Bergen as much as I appreciate her careful attention to nuances of meaning in over-determined German words (i.e., Volk).) The German Christians, who described themselves as "storm troopers of Christ," are pretty much exactly what you would imagine if you set out to imagine a way of reconciling Christianity and Nazism. They were anti-doctrinal, anti-clerical, anti-theological, anti-Semitic, misogynist, repellantly proud of their own ignorance, and capable of some of the most incredibly clusterfucked logical fallacies I have had the dubious pleasure of reading. I shall quote an example:
Most frequently, German Christians based negation of Jesus's Jewishness on their presumption of his antisemitism. Jesus, they asserted, could not have been a Jew because he opposed the Jews. . . . In late 1933 on German Christian offered citations from the Gospels that, he claimed, revealed Jesus' attitude tward Judaism . . . In places, he admitted, the Gospels seemed to suggest the opposite. But those were not the words of Christ, he contended; they were "lies," "Jewishness," the "voice of the Old Testament."
(156)

The German Christians were fanatically devoted to the idea of making the Protestant Church palatable to National Socialism. They were utterly, utterly doomed to failure, since the Nazi high command was pretty much equally committed to the idea of eradicating Christianity from Germany, which makes Bergen's account of their gyrations and contortions pathetic as well as infuriating. But Bergen's research makes it clear that they also represent a inchoate, badly articulated desire prevalaent among many more Germans than those who joined the mvement, to have their cake and eat it, too: to have the comforting, familiar trappings of the Church, the ritual and sense of community, without any of the uncomfortable rules and restrictions and moral accountability for one's actions. This same desire is visible in many other aspects of interbellum "Aryan" German culture; Bergen has found an articulation of it that is mind-boggling in its on-the-nose, epic failure of self-awareness:
In a 1934 declaration, the Protestant faculty of theology in Breslau denounced emphasis on sin as inimical to the needs of the people's church. Blasting Barthian theology, Judaism, and foreign foes in one rancorous breath, the Breslau group announced that Germans could not tolerate a religion based on the concept of sin. "A people," the statement argued, "who, like our own, has a war behind them that they did not want, that they lost, and for which they were declared guilty, cannot bear it, when their sinfulness is constantly pointed out to them in an exaggerated way." The Treaty of Versailles, the Breslauers maintained, made an emphasis on sin untenable. "Our people has suffered so much under the lie of war guilt that it is the task and duty of the church and of theology to use Christianity to give courage to our people, and not to pull them down into political humiliation."
(158)

The German Christians were prepared to mutiliate Christianity, its sacred texts, and everything that makes it a coherent body of thought, in order to make it what they declared the German people wanted.

The German Christians are as horrifying and fascinating as the Nazis themselves, and they follow very much the same trajectory, even extending to the aftermath of World War II, in which, just as "de-Nazification" is highly problematic, the German Christian movement, being disbanded, became a convenient scapegoat for the rest of the Christian Germans (the better to distract attention from their own participation in Germany's psychotic break), but the vast majority of individual German Christians, particularly the rank and file, escaped without being held accountable, without any alteration in their thinking, and without remorse.

Date: 2014-05-26 02:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] txanne.livejournal.com
That puts me in mind of modern American Dominionism, except that the Dominionists really love them some sin-based theology.

Date: 2014-05-27 08:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] swan-tower.livejournal.com
I was thinking the same thing. Prosperity gospel and all that -- warp your theology until it justifies and even glorifies something that everybody else agrees the text unambiguously condemns.

Date: 2014-05-27 12:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] galeni.livejournal.com
Fascinating. Thank you!

Date: 2014-06-01 06:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trebor1415.livejournal.com
You know, for quite some time I've been meaning to ask if you are a historian or what.

I just find your reading topics interesting and your analysis insightful. Just wondering where that comes from, as in professional training, etc.

Date: 2014-06-01 01:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] truepenny.livejournal.com
I got my Ph.D. in English Literature; my research specialty was English Renaissance drama and my minor was Classical (i.e. Greek & Roman) drama, which means a lot of literary criticism, some social history, some theater history, some anthropology, some philosophy ...

The combination of graduate school and professional writer-dom seems to have killed my ability to read fiction for pleasure, so I read non-fiction by the bucketload. At this point, I read purely about things that catch my interest, almost none of which have anything to do with my academic specialties. Mostly, I seem to read about murderers, catastrophes, and places and times at which real societies have functioned like dystopias. So clearly what I read comes from the same thing that makes me a horror writer; how I read comes from a lot of practice in reading like an academic.

Which may be more answer than you were looking for. :)

Date: 2014-06-01 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trebor1415.livejournal.com
No, actually that's pretty much precisely the type of answer I was looking for, thanks.

I actually don't think I'm familiar with your fiction. Why don't you toss me a link to your fiction homepage or a Amazon link or something and I'll check it out.

(It's also possible I am familar with it and just forgot who "Truepenny" was after all this time)

Date: 2014-06-01 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] truepenny.livejournal.com
www.sarahmonette.com (http://www.sarahmonette.com/)
www.katherineaddison.com (http://www.katherineaddison.com/)

My latest book, The Goblin Emperor (http://www.powells.com/biblio/1-9780765326997-0), came out in April.

All my stories available free online are listed here (http://truepenny.livejournal.com/862386.html#cutid1).
Edited Date: 2014-06-01 08:04 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-06-01 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trebor1415.livejournal.com
Cool, it was a matter of forgetting who "truepenny" was. I believe I attended some of your panels at Penquicon or met you at Worldcon.

Profile

truepenny: artist's rendering of Sidneyia inexpectans (Default)
Sarah/Katherine

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 09:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios